3.10 Core Ascertainment Variables
‹View Table of Contents
The first step in determining what core variables will be included in a surveillance programme is to define the goals and objectives of the congenital anomalies surveillance programme. Countries that already have a surveillance programme in place that includes the identification of populations at risk may consider including demographic variables such as maternal age, race and ethnicity, consanguinity, and other factors relevant to the local setting.
To facilitate data collection, countries can evaluate and summarize the availability of existing data sources (e.g. vital registries, and logbooks in hospital units), to determine what information regarding congenital anomalies is already being collected. Also, establishing the percentage of all births that are documented in vital registries, and determining whether the documentation includes only live births or both live births and fetal deaths, can be very useful.
After the list of core variables has been determined, these variables can then be incorporated into the methodology for case ascertainment. Table 3.3 lists core variables to be considered for inclusion in a congenital anomalies surveillance programme. Please refer to Appendix H for a list of core variables for consideration, and their definitions.
Table 3.3 Potential core ascertainment variables
REPORT | FATHER | MOTHER | INFANT |
Information
|
Identification information
|
Identification information
|
Identification information
Birth measurements
|
Obstetric history Total number of:
|
Birth information
|
||
Congenital anomaly/ anomalies present:
Note: if a baby has more than one anomaly, any major congenital anomaly/anomalies are recorded first, followed by any other anomalies.
|
|||
Autopsy results
|
|||
aConsanguinity has long been recognized as a significant factor in the occurrence of autosomal recessive diseases. However, its effect in the determination of single major congenital anomalies remains controversial. Even though some studies have shown variable degrees of association between consanguinity and non-syndromic neural tube defects, hydrocephalus and oral clefts, the majority are based on small numbers of individuals. In addition, differences in methodological approaches hinder comparisons between the different studies. The situation appears to be different for congenital heart defects, for which significant increases among the offspring of consanguineous couples have been identified in several multinational studies (15-21). |
The following optional variables can be included if the surveillance programme in the country has the information available. See Appendix I for a listing of optional variables, and definitions for each.
REPORT | FATHER | MOTHER | INFANT |
Information
|
Information
|
Demographic Information
|
Birth information
|
Obstetric history
|
Table of Contents
- Chapter 3: Approaches to Surveillance
- 3.1 Population Coverage
- 3.2 Case Ascertainment
- 3.3 Case Finding
- 3.4 Case Inclusion
- 3.5 Description Formats for Congenital Anomalies
- 3.6 Age of Inclusion
- 3.7 Inclusion of Pregnancy Outcomes
- 3.8 Coding System
- 3.9 Potential Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria
- ›3.10 Core Ascertainment Variables
- 3.11 Data-Collection Methods and Tools
- 3.12 Data Management and Protocols
- 3.13 Data Collection and Management